Professionally written papers on this topic:

An Analysis of "Braveheart":
This 5 page paper examines the movie "Braveheart" from a psychological perspective. This paper specifically addresses the notion of desired illu...
Film Analysis - The Use Of Geography In 'Braveheart'
A 5 page paper discussing the physical setting of the Mel Gibson movie. The story of Braveheart spans several years in its full telling, but the primary f...
“Braveheart”: Fact and Fiction
A 5 page paper which examines the historical changes made by the director in order to appeal to the audience. Bibliography lists 3 sources. ...
Military Technology & the Movies
A 5 page paper discussing the nuclear revolution in terms of military involvement today, with the military technology of years ago. Movies discussed includ...
Meeting Summary 5 Best Recipes for Glycemic Control
This 5 page paper provides an overview of a class developed to address diabetes management techniques in the elderly. This paper reflects the actions that...
Click here to view more papers...

braveheart 5

Very rarely in a historically based film is every action fact but rather there is a mix of fact and fiction in the film. Braveheart follows this mold since it is a historically based film that includes fiction intertwined with true history. These fictious additions to the film make it a better film cinematically but can make the film too over the top, which would take away from the film. Braveheart is able to tell the true tale of William Wallace in a way that is mostly true and the fictions parts only add to the plot and do not take away from Wallace and are easy to point out and don't adversely degrade him. However, in Braveheart, there is a lot of false information regarding the battle scenes. Therefore, Braveheart is a semi historically accurate movie but some details are false. William Wallace, the patriot fighter for Scotland, was a real person who really fought heroically for his country. Wallace was an outlawed because he did not the sign Ragman Roll, which bound signatories in loyalty to England's King Edward I, which is true. Wallace like the movie showed organized other outlawed men into an army, however what was not shown was that he had a partner, Andrew Moray, who was killed at Stirling Bridge. The most glaring and important piece of fiction pertaining to Wallace was the fact that he was a landed commoner with a good education, and in peaceful times he might have been a scholar. However, in the movie he was portrayed as a poor man who was secretly married right before he got in trouble with the English. So in the respect of Wallace the movie did truthfully show his greatness but added some fictions information to make him seem more "middle class". (Sullivan) The other main component of the film was the battle scenes. It is true that Scotland did not win every battle, and the English were not immediately cast out of Scottish territory. Only after Wallace was killed, did Scottish victory come. One part of the film showed that Wallace invented the use of spears against horses however this tactic is literally ancient. Also, they didn't stand in one big mob, but in circular formations called schiltrons. Another inaccurate part of the film was the Scottish painting their faces. It is true that it was a Celtic practice but it was during Roman times, over a thousand years before. In the film Irish troops switched sides, as they were suppose to charge against the Scottish however this too is false. (Sullivan) Braveheart does a wonderful job tell the story in a accurate matter and the only time false information is used it is obvious that it was added by Hollywood. Braveheart in general is a accurate film and can be used to discuss its time period.
475 wds  

Just Free Papers © 2018 Intuitive Products International, all rights reserved.     Disclaimer